UPS Wins USPS Air Cargo Contract Amid Logistics Shakeup

The United States Postal Service (USPS) shifting its air freight contract from FedEx to UPS has sent ripples through the logistics industry. This move reflects USPS's cost-cutting initiatives, UPS's ambition for market expansion, and FedEx's strategic realignment. Increased competition and diversified collaborations are expected to drive service innovation and efficiency improvements, ultimately benefiting consumers. The change signifies a significant shift in the air cargo landscape and highlights the ongoing battle for dominance in the express delivery market.
UPS Wins USPS Air Cargo Contract Amid Logistics Shakeup

A single contract has sent shockwaves through the logistics industry. When the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) transferred its major air cargo operations from FedEx to United Parcel Service (UPS), the implications extended far beyond a simple business handover. This shift marks a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of logistics, reflecting deeper transformations in competitive dynamics and strategic partnerships amid the relentless growth of e-commerce. What drove this decision, and how will UPS's victory reshape the future of logistics?

A Strategic Shift: The Calculus Behind USPS's Air Cargo Contract

The announcement that UPS secured USPS's "significant air cargo contract" immediately drew industry-wide attention. According to UPS's official statement, the contract took effect immediately and, after a transition period, will position UPS as USPS's primary air cargo provider, handling the majority of its domestic air freight operations. Meanwhile, FedEx disclosed in an SEC 8-K filing that its FedEx Express subsidiary's contract with USPS will expire on September 29, 2024.

Satish Jindel, president of SJ Consulting, noted that USPS's air cargo contracts and network have undergone significant changes over the past two decades. USPS is adjusting its Priority Mail service level, originally designed to compete with FedEx and UPS's deferred services by offering a two-day delivery network. Jindel emphasized that changes like extending First-Class mail delivery times from "next-day" to "two-to-five days" have reduced the need for overnight shipping. He pointed out that USPS Postmaster General Louis DeJoy had already signaled intentions to scale back air cargo contracts in the 2021 "Delivering for America" 10-year plan.

"If FedEx failed to adapt its network to declining USPS demand, the contract may no longer be attractive to them," Jindel said. "FedEx's claim that it dislikes current pricing and needs to raise rates is debatable. USPS has been focused on cost reduction and found UPS willing to handle this business at an acceptable price. I doubt UPS would take on a loss-making operation—they’ve had an integrated network for over 20 years. USPS simply needs a committed timeline for moving packages, whether by air or ground. UPS will approach this differently, making it an incremental positive, not a negative."

Competition and Cooperation: Pandemic-Driven Logistics Adjustments

Gordon Glazer, a senior consultant at Shipware, noted that the transition from FedEx to UPS began during the pandemic as a form of "coopetition"—a blend of competition and collaboration between FedEx and USPS. He explained that in early 2020, FedEx accelerated its SmartPost transformation, which had relied on USPS for last-mile delivery. Simultaneously, Postmaster DeJoy implemented permanent changes to reduce air transport reliance, including extending delivery windows and shifting First-Class mail and parcels from air to ground.

"UPS's revenue is heavily tied to Amazon, while FedEx shed a smaller portion of Amazon-related revenue when it ended air services in 2019," Glazer said. "This made UPS the logical choice for USPS's air contract. However, UPS now manages two high-volume clients (Amazon and USPS), creating vulnerability if either contract terminates abruptly. FedEx, meanwhile, can focus on internal growth rather than supporting a competitor."

He added that UPS's selective pandemic-era client cuts allowed it to prioritize higher-margin shippers, while FedEx's Ground Economy now handles most budget parcels independently. "UPS SurePost delivers about half its parcels itself, reserving lower-margin deliveries for USPS. Meanwhile, UPS Mail Innovations relies entirely on USPS. With excess capacity in the market, carriers are fiercely competing for volume."

The Profit Equation: Pricing, Service, and Strategic Choices

Shipware founder Rob Martinez argued that losing a billion-dollar contract is undeniably damaging for FedEx, despite its attempts to downplay the impact. "Two weeks ago, FedEx executives claimed 'significant progress' in negotiations. Clearly, they needed structural adjustments to make the USPS relationship profitable—or at least break-even," Martinez said. "FedEx hoped to retain air and Priority business with reduced operational burdens, but USPS opted for UPS's offer."

Martinez compared the situation to FedEx's 2019 split with Amazon, noting it took over a year—and a global pandemic—for FedEx to refill its network. "Amazon has since excluded FedEx as a primary carrier, while UPS capitalized on the opportunity. One company's loss is another's gain. For UPS, this is a strategic win—it secures high-value air cargo volume for four years and offsets Amazon-related declines."

He added: "Shippers constantly evaluate carrier performance and cost. When one draws a line, another often steps in with better terms. The deeper the integration, the harder it is to switch—but this transition will be painful for all parties in the short term."

Industry Veterans Weigh In: Long-Term Partnerships and Strategic Pivots

Jerry Hempstead of Hempstead Consulting speculated that FedEx may have taken its USPS business for granted after 20 years. "This contract originated under Postmaster Bill Henderson and FedEx founder Fred Smith," he recalled. "DeJoy, with his logistics background, rationalized the network. Most mail and e-commerce parcels aren’t urgent, so ground transport suffices. FedEx likely underestimated UPS CEO Carol Tomé's determination in a soft demand market."

Andre Winters of HudsonWinters & Co. outlined five key implications:

  • UPS Expands Its Footprint: The deal significantly boosts UPS's capabilities, aligning with its goals to cut costs, increase scale, and enhance competitiveness against FedEx and Amazon.
  • Mutual Benefits: UPS gains broader reach and revenue, while USPS can focus on modernizing its strained infrastructure.
  • Consumer and Competitive Impact: Co-loading USPS freight may lower UPS's costs, potentially reducing rates and forcing rivals to rethink strategies.
  • Revenue and Market Share Loss for FedEx: FedEx faces revenue erosion and competitive pressure amid pilot union negotiations and network integration.
  • FedEx's Potential Response: FedEx may seek new partnerships or accelerate workforce reductions. Rumors suggest a possible Amazon reconciliation.

The Road Ahead: A New Chapter in Logistics Competition

USPS's contract shift marks a watershed moment for the logistics industry. It underscores USPS's cost-control priorities and UPS's ambition to expand market share while optimizing operations. For FedEx, losing a long-standing contract presents challenges but could spur strategic reassessment, particularly in B2C growth. For the broader industry, this realignment may drive innovation and efficiency, ultimately benefiting consumers.

As e-commerce continues to reshape demand, logistics competition will intensify, and partnerships will diversify. Adaptability will be key to survival—and USPS's contract transition may be just the beginning of a larger transformation.