LA and Long Beach Ports to Charge Fees for Delayed Containers

To alleviate port congestion, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach announced surcharges on lingering containers starting November 1st. The new rule aims to accelerate container turnover, but its effectiveness remains to be seen. The root cause of port congestion lies in the supply-demand imbalance, requiring systemic solutions. These include increasing throughput capacity, optimizing land transportation, and improving digitalization. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for long-term improvement and stability within the supply chain.
LA and Long Beach Ports to Charge Fees for Delayed Containers

If the global supply chain were a taut web, the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach would be among its most vulnerable nodes. Picture mountains of shipping containers piling up while cargo ships wait impatiently offshore—a scenario that represents both a logistics nightmare and a significant challenge for global trade.

To address worsening congestion, the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and Port of Long Beach (POLB) announced they will begin charging new fees on imported containers left lingering at terminals starting November 1.

The Pressure Points of Global Trade

These twin ports handle approximately 40% of U.S. imports, meaning their congestion directly impacts supply chain stability nationwide and globally. The new policy aims to use financial incentives to spur shipping companies to accelerate container turnover and improve port efficiency.

Under the rules, containers moving by rail will incur a $100 per container per day fee if they remain at terminals for more than nine days, with the penalty increasing by $100 each subsequent day. For truck-transported containers, the grace period shortens to six days with identical fee escalation. This means a container lingering beyond ten days could rack up $5,500 in penalties for the shipping company.

Uncertain Impact

The effectiveness of this measure remains to be seen. While the fees may motivate shipping companies to better coordinate container movement, several factors could limit their impact:

• If overland transport capacity remains insufficient or consumer demand weakens, the financial burden may ultimately pass to consumers through higher prices

• Labor union efficiency and terminal equipment maintenance significantly influence container turnover rates

• Port authorities will continuously assess congestion levels and may suspend or adjust fees accordingly

Root Causes and Systemic Solutions

Data analysis reveals the congestion stems fundamentally from supply-demand imbalance. Pandemic-driven consumption surges outpaced the response capacity of supply chain components. Additional contributing factors include:

• Chronic labor shortages at ports and warehouses

• Aging infrastructure and equipment

• Information gaps between supply chain partners

Experts emphasize that resolving port congestion requires comprehensive solutions—expanding port capacity, optimizing overland transport networks, and advancing supply chain digitization. While the new fees represent a short-term mitigation tactic, building a more resilient and efficient global supply chain will require sustained, coordinated effort across industries and nations.