Shipping Lines Face Calls for Transparency After Hanjin Collapse

Following the Hanjin Shipping bankruptcy, shippers' demand for financial transparency in shipping companies has surged, with risk assessment tools like Z-score gaining prominence. Information asymmetry and regulatory gaps pose challenges. Shippers need to enhance due diligence, leverage third-party assessments, negotiate contractual clauses, and establish industry alliances. Diversifying carriers, exploring alternative options, optimizing inventory, and strengthening communication are effective risk management strategies. The shipping industry is moving towards greater transparency, regulation, and sustainability.
Shipping Lines Face Calls for Transparency After Hanjin Collapse

Imagine your cargo adrift at sea with no estimated arrival date—all because your chosen shipping line suddenly went bankrupt. The Hanjin Shipping collapse detonated like a seismic charge through global supply chains, forcing shippers to confront an uncomfortable truth: operating without visibility into carriers' financial health amounts to reckless gambling. In the aftermath, demands for shipping line transparency have reached unprecedented levels, initiating a high-stakes game of trust versus risk.

Surge in Shipping Risk Assessment Demand

Consultancy Drewry reports to industry analysts that inquiries about carriers' financial data—particularly Z-scores (a predictive bankruptcy risk metric)—have spiked dramatically since Hanjin filed for receivership. Shippers now fear other carriers may follow suit amid current market conditions, potentially triggering catastrophic supply chain disruptions. Industry risk levels are projected to climb further by quarter's end as investor anxiety intensifies.

The Transparency Paradox

Yet obtaining accurate financial data remains challenging. Many carriers treat such information as proprietary, sometimes withholding it even from established consultancies like Drewry. This opacity has prompted progressive shippers to take direct action: demanding undisclosed financial statements under nondisclosure agreements. This emerging practice underscores both the urgency for transparency and shippers' determination to mitigate exposure.

Hanjin's Global Ripple Effects

The Korean carrier's bankruptcy created cascading worldwide disruptions—mountains of stranded containers, delay claims, and financial losses that left logistics managers questioning the sector's stability. No business can tolerate indefinite cargo detention, making financial vetting of carriers during contract renewals an operational imperative. Carriers resisting heightened scrutiny now risk losing contracts outright.

Z-Score: The Financial Early Warning System

Developed by NYU professor Edward Altman in 1968, the Z-Score model evaluates bankruptcy probability through five weighted financial ratios:

  • X1: Working capital / Total assets
  • X2: Retained earnings / Total assets
  • X3: EBIT / Total assets
  • X4: Market equity / Total liabilities
  • X5: Revenue / Total assets

Scoring interpretation:

  • Z > 2.99: Low bankruptcy risk
  • 1.81–2.99: Caution zone
  • Z < 1.81: High bankruptcy probability

Transparency Roadblocks and Solutions

Three primary challenges hinder financial transparency:

  • Corporate reluctance to disclose sensitive data
  • Absence of standardized disclosure regulations
  • Questions about data authenticity

Shippers can counteract these obstacles by:

  • Conducting thorough due diligence
  • Engaging independent auditors
  • Negotiating disclosure clauses into contracts
  • Forming industry coalitions to advocate for transparency

Comprehensive Risk Management Strategies

Beyond financial analysis, shippers should implement:

  • Carrier diversification
  • Contingency transport plans
  • Optimized inventory controls
  • Enhanced stakeholder communication
  • Cargo insurance coverage

The Hanjin crisis served as a wake-up call for global supply chains, demonstrating that financial transparency isn't merely preferable—it's essential for operational security. As expectations evolve, carriers must recognize that openness builds competitive advantage, while shippers require robust vetting processes to navigate an increasingly volatile shipping landscape.