Today we examine a topic that might sound mundane but affects every American: the state of our nation's surface transportation infrastructure. From daily commutes to school drop-offs and package deliveries, our lives depend on an extensive network of roads, bridges, and efficient transportation systems. However, this infrastructure doesn't maintain itself—it requires constant upkeep, upgrades, and sometimes complete reconstruction, all of which depend on decisions made in Congress.
What Is Surface Transportation Reauthorization?
Surface transportation reauthorization refers to the federal legislation that funds state and local governments for building and maintaining roads, bridges, public transit, and other ground transportation infrastructure. Think of it as a massive "transportation fund" through which the federal government allocates money to states for various infrastructure projects.
These authorization bills typically span multiple years (usually five or six), with the federal government disbursing specified amounts annually for transportation initiatives throughout the authorization period.
Why Does America Need Reauthorization?
The answer is simple: our infrastructure is aging. Many roads and bridges were constructed decades ago and now show significant wear from years of use and exposure. Problems like potholes, structural deterioration, and traffic congestion don't just inconvenience travelers—they create safety hazards and economic inefficiencies.
Poor infrastructure directly impacts economic productivity when goods can't move efficiently or when excessive commute times reduce workforce effectiveness. Regular maintenance and modernization through surface transportation reauthorization are essential for public safety and economic vitality.
Key Discussion Points from SMC3 JumpStart 2021
At the recent SMC3 JumpStart 2021 virtual conference, three freight transportation experts examined prospects for future federal surface transportation legislation, expressing cautious optimism about bipartisan cooperation on long-term agreements.
The panelists included:
- Tom Jensen: Senior VP of Transportation Policy at UPS
- Randy Mullett: Principal at Mullett Strategies, LLC
- Dan Furth: Consultant at Veedon Fleece Partners and former President/CEO of National Tank Truck Company
Expert Perspectives
Randy Mullett: Expressed cautious optimism about bipartisan cooperation but noted concerns that Democratic infrastructure definitions might expand to include non-traditional projects like broadband and energy networks, potentially diverting funds from conventional road and bridge projects.
Dan Furth: Highlighted continuity factors like Representative DeFazio remaining as House Transportation Committee chair and incoming Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg's interest in reevaluating the federal gas tax, potentially leading to its first increase since 1993.
Tom Jensen: While optimistic about bipartisan infrastructure proposals, he warned that new legislation might prioritize climate and sustainability factors over freight transportation needs compared to previous bills.
Funding Challenges and Potential Solutions
The primary funding mechanism—federal fuel taxes—faces declining revenue due to improved vehicle efficiency and electric vehicle adoption. Potential alternatives include:
- Increasing fuel taxes (politically challenging)
- Implementing a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax
- Transferring general fund dollars (risking other programs)
Understanding Vehicle Miles Traveled Tax
The VMT tax represents a mileage-based alternative to fuel taxes, charging drivers based on road usage rather than fuel consumption. While it offers fairness and sustainability advantages, implementation challenges include privacy concerns, technological requirements, setup costs, and public acceptance.
Potential VMT implementation methods range from onboard GPS devices to smartphone apps or annual mileage reporting. Despite obstacles, many view VMT as the future of road funding as electric vehicles proliferate.
Broader Implications and Public Engagement
Beyond legislative debates, surface transportation reauthorization raises important questions about:
- Balancing urban and rural infrastructure needs
- Leveraging smart technologies for traffic management
- Exploring international best practices
While citizens can't directly influence congressional decisions, they can contribute by staying informed about transportation policy, practicing safe driving habits, choosing sustainable transportation options when possible, and supporting environmental initiatives that reduce infrastructure strain.
This complex issue ultimately connects to our collective safety, economic health, and quality of life. As infrastructure debates continue in Washington, all stakeholders must work toward solutions that maintain and improve the vital networks connecting our communities and powering our economy.