Global Shipping Guide Understanding Port Codes

This article provides an in-depth analysis of common five-letter port codes used in international trade. It highlights key ports such as Lusi Port and Nantong Port in Nantong, Jiangsu, and Busan Port (PUSAN) in South Korea. It also clarifies the meanings of easily confused port codes like ZIN, TXG, and KHH. Furthermore, the article offers practical advice on how to avoid port code confusion, aiming to help readers better understand and apply port codes, ultimately improving efficiency in international trade.
Global Shipping Guide Understanding Port Codes

In international trade and maritime operations, port codes serve as unique identifiers—essential "passports" that precisely locate harbors worldwide. These five-character combinations form a critical yet often overlooked aspect of global commerce.

Nantong's Port Complex: More Than Meets the Eye

Contrary to common perception, China's Jiangsu province hosts multiple significant ports in the Nantong region:

  • Lusi Port (Code: CNLUS): Located in Qidong City, this provincial-level key port combines fishing operations with growing trade activities. Its proximity to the Lusi fishing grounds provides natural advantages while developing modern logistics infrastructure.
  • Nantong Port: As the primary regional harbor, it serves as a crucial domestic container hub, connecting central Jiangsu with inland waterways. The port's hinterland extends across Yancheng, Huaian, Taixing and surrounding areas.

The province's comprehensive port network further includes Lianyungang, Taicang, Zhangjiagang, Jiangyin, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, and Nanjing ports—collectively forming one of China's most developed maritime systems.

Busan Port (PUS): Korea's Maritime Gateway

Dominating Korea's shipping landscape, Busan Port (code: PUS) ranks among the world's busiest harbors. Its strategic position near the Korea Strait—facing Japan's Tsushima Island—establishes it as Northeast Asia's premier transshipment center.

Industry professionals note that transit ports may appear in shipping documentation. For instance, SAN PEDRO indicates Los Angeles-area transshipment, while PUSAN designates cargo routing through Busan.

Interpreting Ambiguous Port Codes

Shipping lines frequently employ divergent coding systems, creating operational challenges:

  • ZIN: COSCO typically assigns this to Xiamen, while Maersk, APL and OOCL reference Tianjin.
  • TXG: COSCO and CSCL associate this with Tianjin, whereas other carriers designate Taichung.
  • KHH: This maintains relative consistency, universally representing Kaohsiung Port in Taiwan.

Mitigating Code Confusion

To prevent shipping documentation errors, industry experts recommend:

  1. Confirm carrier-specific coding systems before finalizing documentation
  2. Prioritize standardized identifiers like UN/LOCODE when possible
  3. Verify codes directly with carriers or freight forwarders during booking

Mastering port code conventions enables more efficient international trade operations and logistics management. As global supply chains grow increasingly complex, precise code usage becomes ever more critical for seamless maritime commerce.