A sudden wave of trademark enforcement is targeting sellers of silicone mats, leaving many online retailers facing product takedowns and frozen assets. The legal action centers around the registered trademark "Slap Mat," with potentially severe consequences for unauthorized use.
On August 13, the law firm Saper initiated legal proceedings on behalf of an anonymous plaintiff, later revealed to be Wham Bam Systems, LLC. The company is enforcing its rights to the "Slap Mat" trademark (U.S. Registration No. 6193462), registered under Class 20 for silicone-based work surface protectors. The trademark was officially registered on November 10, 2020, meaning any unlicensed use of the term in connection with silicone mats could constitute infringement.
The Company Behind the Trademark
Wham Bam Systems was founded in 2019 by inventor and designer Peter Solomon, specializing in 3D printing technology. The company produces 3D printer components, systems, and various 3D printed products. Their "Slap Mat" silicone pad has emerged as one of their flagship offerings.
The product distinguishes itself through premium silicone construction offering exceptional tension, flexibility, insulation, pressure resistance, and temperature stability. These properties allow the mats to maintain performance under demanding conditions while providing reliable work surface protection. The material's inherent anti-slip, shock-absorbing, heat-resistant, and waterproof qualities make it suitable for diverse applications.
Wide-Ranging Applications
- Household Use: Functions as coasters or placemats with anti-slip, heat-resistant, and easy-clean properties.
- Industrial Applications: Serves as protective buffers and fasteners for machinery, reducing wear and improving operational efficiency.
- 3D Printing: Protects printer platforms and printed objects, enhancing print quality and surface finish.
Retailers are urged to immediately review their product listings for any unauthorized use of the "Slap Mat" trademark. Legal experts recommend removing potentially infringing products and consulting intellectual property attorneys to mitigate risks. This case underscores the importance of thorough trademark clearance before listing products, particularly in competitive e-commerce markets.