China Files WTO Complaint Over EU EV Subsidies

China has filed a lawsuit with the WTO against the EU's provisional anti-subsidy measures on electric vehicles. China argues that the EU's ruling lacks factual and legal basis, violates WTO rules, and harms global climate cooperation. China urges the EU to correct its mistakes and safeguard China-EU economic and trade cooperation and the stability of the industrial chain and supply chain. The lawsuit underscores China's firm opposition to protectionist measures and its commitment to upholding the multilateral trading system.
China Files WTO Complaint Over EU EV Subsidies

As global attention remains fixed on climate change and the transition to green energy, the European Union's decision to impose provisional anti-subsidy measures on Chinese electric vehicles has introduced an unsettling disruption. In response, China formally initiated legal proceedings at the World Trade Organization (WTO) on August 9, asserting the legitimate rights of its electric vehicle industry and defending the broader trajectory of international green cooperation.

A spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce stated that the EU's preliminary ruling lacked sufficient factual and legal grounding, violating core WTO regulations. The measures not only harm China's electric vehicle sector but also pose a potential threat to global climate mitigation efforts. Beijing has urged Brussels to promptly rectify its approach to preserve stable trade relations and safeguard the security of worldwide electric vehicle supply chains.

The dispute underscores China's commitment to multilateral trade governance and its opposition to protectionist policies. Analysts suggest the case could set a precedent for how trade rules intersect with environmental priorities, particularly as nations accelerate decarbonization efforts. The outcome may influence future disputes over green technology subsidies and market access.

Industry observers note that while trade tensions persist, both economies remain interdependent in clean energy development. The resolution of this dispute could shape the pace and equity of the global energy transition, with implications for manufacturers, consumers, and climate goals alike.