Imagine receiving a lawsuit notice alleging your best-selling power outlet infringes on patents. This scenario has become reality as Epicord, a leader in power connection solutions, takes legal action to protect its intellectual property. Rubio & Associates law firm has filed the patent infringement case (24-cv-22237) in Florida, serving as a warning to cross-border sellers.
Case Overview
- Filing Date: June 10, 2024
- Case Number: 24-cv-22237
- Plaintiff: Epicord power outlets
- Brand Owner: ZH BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Representing Firm: Rubio & Associates
- Jurisdiction: Florida, United States
- Patents Involved: (Specific patent details pending further investigation)
About Epicord: Power Connection Specialists
ZH BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL's Epicord brand specializes in power connection solutions, offering products including RV power cords, adapters, extension cables, and booster cables. These products are widely used in recreational areas, automotive parks, and campgrounds. The allegedly infringed product involves Epicord's ultra-safe power outlet designed specifically for these applications.
Risk Assessment: Compliance Recommendations
The lawsuit centers on patent protections for Epicord's power outlet designs. Sellers are advised to conduct immediate compliance checks focusing on:
- Product Comparison: Carefully examine power outlet designs, functionality, and technical specifications against Epicord's products, particularly regarding any similar innovative features.
- Patent Research: Conduct professional patent searches to verify whether products potentially infringe on Epicord's or other companies' intellectual property.
- Regulatory Compliance: Ensure products meet all relevant safety standards and regulations to avoid legal complications.
- Proactive Measures: If potential infringement is identified, immediately remove affected products from sale and seek legal counsel for appropriate response strategies.
As e-commerce competition intensifies, intellectual property protection becomes increasingly critical. This case serves as a reminder for sellers to strengthen IP awareness and operate within legal frameworks to maintain fair market practices.