
When Elon Musk ambitiously launched xAI's "Grok" chatbot—positioned as a rebellious alternative to ChatGPT—an unexpected coincidence emerged: the name had already been trademarked by musician Grimes for an AI plush toy series she helped design. This collision of intellectual property raises questions about trademark rights while highlighting broader discussions about artificial intelligence in children's education and commercial competition.
Two Groks, One Name
The core of this unusual situation lies in two distinct projects sharing the same distinctive name. On one side stands xAI's chatbot, marketed as willing to answer "spicy questions" that other AI systems might refuse. On the other sits Curio's interactive plush toys, designed by Grimes to stimulate childhood creativity through conversation.
Records show Curio filed for the "Grok" trademark on September 12, 2023—over a month before xAI's October 23 application. According to sources, Curio's "Grok" originated as shorthand for "Grocket," inspired by Grimes' children's fascination with rockets—a nod to their father Elon Musk's SpaceX enterprise.
Curio's Educational Vision
The toy line features three characters: Grok (a rocket ship voiced by Grimes), Gabbo (a furry gaming console with limbs), and Grem (a teal bunny with heart-shaped cheeks). These plush companions employ dynamic dialogue rather than scripted responses to nurture early creativity.
In development discussions with Curio founders, Grimes emphasized creating tools that help children "access imagination in real life" rather than passively consuming media. While acknowledging her own heavy screen use, she expressed concern about excessive device exposure for young children.
The Wi-Fi enabled toys contain rechargeable speakers and microphones, connecting to a parental control app. Grok can explain rocket science, play games, and practice conversational skills—positioned as what Grimes calls "a thought partner" to exercise working memory through verbal interaction.
Philosophical Foundations
Grimes joined Curio after publicly speculating about AI-enhanced childhood companions. She previously commented on the concept of "cultural ship-mind teddy bears" that could safely converse with children at night—a vision now materializing through these products.
This educational philosophy reflects Grimes' broader critique of passive screen time. She aims to create interactive alternatives that develop cognitive abilities while reducing tablet dependence—though she acknowledges the irony of using advanced technology to counter technological overuse.
Trademark Implications
While Curio's earlier filing establishes legal precedence, xAI's corporate resources could prompt a protracted trademark dispute. Resolution may hinge on product differentiation—educational toys versus AI chatbots—and likelihood of consumer confusion.
Both parties currently maintain diplomatic tones. Grimes remarked lightheartedly about the situation: "Now there are two AIs named Grok. I can't wait for them to become friends." She added wryly, "I can't believe even AI isn't safe from showing up to school and meeting another kid with your name."
Broader Industry Questions
Beyond trademark issues, this incident spotlights emerging debates about AI in child development. While interactive toys promise educational benefits, they raise ethical concerns about data collection, behavioral influence, and the appropriate role of artificial companions in formative years.
The situation grows more complex given Grimes and Musk's ongoing custody negotiations involving their three children. This personal dimension adds narrative layers to what might otherwise remain a straightforward corporate trademark dispute.
Looking Forward
The dual Grok phenomenon represents more than intellectual property contention—it encapsulates critical discussions about technology's role in education, family dynamics in innovation, and how society might responsibly integrate AI into childhood development. As both products evolve, their parallel existence may continue prompting reflection on these intersecting frontiers.