US Rail Freight Mixed Carloads Rise Intermodal Falls

The US rail freight market is showing a diverging trend: carload traffic is slightly increasing, while intermodal volume continues to decline. Coal and grain shipments are driving the growth in carload traffic, but slowing consumer demand and supply chain bottlenecks are contributing to the decrease in intermodal volume. Year-to-date data indicates that the decline in intermodal transportation is a long-term trend. Rail freight data reflects structural changes in the economy and provides valuable reference for business and government decision-making.
US Rail Freight Mixed Carloads Rise Intermodal Falls

A long freight train loaded with coal, grain, and various commodities traversing America's vast landscape represents more than just transportation—it pulses with the nation's economic vitality. Recent data from the Association of American Railroads (AAR), however, reveals this pulse beating unevenly, signaling potential challenges in the economic recovery.

Key Metrics: Diverging Trends in Rail Performance

For the week ending August 20, U.S. rail carloads reached 237,404 units, marking a 2.9% year-over-year increase. This modest growth demonstrates resilience in bulk commodity transportation. Conversely, intermodal containers and trailers declined by 2.4% to 264,144 units. As intermodal shipping often serves as an economic barometer, this contraction suggests weakening consumer demand or persistent supply chain constraints.

Commodity Breakdown: Drivers of Growth and Decline

Seven of ten commodity categories tracked by AAR showed annual growth. Coal led the expansion with 4,321 additional carloads (68,280 total), followed by grain (up 2,825 to 20,974) and agricultural products excluding grain (up 2,128 to 17,031). These gains reflect stable energy demand, agricultural output, and inelastic food consumption.

Declines appeared in miscellaneous carloads (down 1,951 to 8,600), metallic ores and metals (down 1,248 to 22,270), and petroleum products (down 627 to 9,681), potentially indicating manufacturing slowdowns and energy market volatility.

Intermodal Decline: Multiple Contributing Factors

The sustained intermodal contraction warrants particular attention due to its implications for global trade. Several factors may be driving this trend:

  • Shifting consumer spending: Persistent inflation may be redirecting expenditures from goods to services
  • Supply chain friction: Residual port congestion and trucker shortages continue affecting efficiency
  • Inventory adjustments: Businesses reducing stockpiles accumulated during pandemic disruptions
  • Trade policy: Global economic uncertainty and protectionist measures creating headwinds

Year-to-Date Perspective: Concerning Long-Term Patterns

Cumulative data through 2022's first 33 weeks shows U.S. rail carloads essentially flat (7,606,648 units, -0.01%), while intermodal volume fell 5.5% to 8,707,653 units. This suggests the intermodal downturn represents more than temporary fluctuation.

North American rail data (encompassing U.S., Canadian, and Mexican operators) mirrors this pattern—total carloads grew 2.3% weekly but intermodal fell 1.7%. Year-to-date North American rail freight declined 2.8% overall.

Economic Implications and Forward Outlook

The rail freight divergence highlights structural economic shifts and global trade complexities. While carload growth demonstrates commodity sector resilience, intermodal weakness signals consumer caution and supply chain vulnerabilities.

Future rail performance remains clouded by inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, and geopolitical risks. Rail operators must enhance efficiency and service flexibility while exploring new markets. Policy measures supporting infrastructure investment, intermodal development, and fair trade practices could help stabilize this critical economic indicator.

Analytical Perspective: Reading Between the Data Lines

Beyond surface-level interpretation, rail freight data offers nuanced economic insights. Commodity-specific trends reveal sectoral health, while regional comparisons illuminate geographic disparities. Emerging factors like e-commerce growth and environmental priorities may reshape future demand patterns, requiring adaptive strategies from rail operators.

This data serves as both economic diagnostic tool and decision-making resource, provided analysts contextualize metrics within broader macroeconomic conditions.

Conclusion: A Divided Market Reflects Recovery Challenges

The current rail freight landscape presents a complex economic portrait—modest carload gains juxtaposed against intermodal declines create a bifurcated market. This divergence underscores the uneven nature of post-pandemic recovery and the challenges confronting comprehensive economic rebound. Understanding these dynamics informs effective response strategies to maintain rail's vital role in economic growth.