Warner Bros Cracks Down on Harry Potter Trademark Violations

Warner Bros Cracks Down on Harry Potter Trademark Violations

TME Law Firm, representing Warner Bros. Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit (case number 25-cv-00142) regarding trademark infringement related to Harry Potter. Sellers are advised to conduct a self-check of their store inventory to ensure all Harry Potter-related products for sale are officially licensed, thus avoiding potential infringement risks. This action aims to protect the Harry Potter brand and its intellectual property rights. Sellers should verify the authenticity of their products and licensing agreements.

Lawsuit Targets Ecommerce Sellers Over Cup Design Patent

Lawsuit Targets Ecommerce Sellers Over Cup Design Patent

DRINKING CUP initiated a patent infringement lawsuit, case number 24-cv-9778. The case involves a design patent for a leak-proof sports water bottle. Cross-border e-commerce sellers offering similar products are advised to conduct self-checks for potential infringement risks. It is recommended to promptly remove problematic products from listings and consult with legal professionals to avoid unnecessary losses. This action highlights the importance of patent due diligence for online retailers selling globally.

Glow Glove Patent Lawsuit Freezes Assets at 42 Stores

Glow Glove Patent Lawsuit Freezes Assets at 42 Stores

An anonymous patent infringement lawsuit filed by Bright Hand LLC regarding glow gloves resulted in a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) freezing assets of 42 stores. The case involves issues of patent ownership transfer, product design features, and the strategy of anonymous litigation. The targeted stores should actively respond to the lawsuit to avoid further losses. This event raises concerns about intellectual property protection and fair market competition. It highlights the complexities and potential impact of patent disputes, particularly when anonymity is involved, on businesses and the broader market.

Amazon Sellers Face Patent Suit Over LED Candles

Amazon Sellers Face Patent Suit Over LED Candles

A patent enforcement lawsuit (Case No. 24-cv-11454) regarding flameless LED electronic candles initiated by Changsha seller Caifa Jiang in the United States has commenced. This product is a bestseller on Amazon, particularly before holidays. It is recommended that relevant sellers immediately conduct self-checks, verify patent information, avoid infringement risks, and ensure smooth store operations.

Evia Law Sues Over Heat Transfer Printer Patent for Ningbo Langyan

Evia Law Sues Over Heat Transfer Printer Patent for Ningbo Langyan

Evia Law PLC represents Ningbo Langyan E-commerce Co., Ltd. in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning a heat transfer printer bracket. This bracket aims to solve the problem of insufficient operating space in heat press machines. Sellers should be aware of the risk of infringement and immediately check their stores for similar products. It is recommended to promptly remove any infringing items and consult with legal counsel to avoid legal disputes. This action is crucial to prevent potential legal ramifications related to the patented design of the heat transfer bracket.

Spanish Artist Sues Over Manatee Artwork Infringement

Spanish Artist Sues Over Manatee Artwork Infringement

Spanish artist Marta Rodriguez Veiga's manatee artwork has been subjected to copyright infringement, and she has retained Keith Law Firm to file a lawsuit. The artwork is widely used in gifts, pillows, home decor, and other areas. Sellers are advised to immediately conduct self-checks, remove infringing listings, and contact legal counsel for solutions. It is crucial to strengthen copyright awareness to avoid legal issues.

Wham Bam Systems Enforces slap Mat Trademark in 3D Printing Market

Wham Bam Systems Enforces slap Mat Trademark in 3D Printing Market

Trademark enforcement for "Slap Mat" silicone mats has been initiated with a lawsuit filed by Wham Bam Systems, LLC. The trademark is registered under Class 20, covering work surface protectors made of silicone. Cross-border sellers should be vigilant, as unauthorized use of this trademark may lead to TRO infringement risks. It is recommended to immediately conduct a self-check of store products to avoid potential losses.

Supacaz Sues Counterfeit Bicycle Accessory Sellers Over Trademark

Supacaz Sues Counterfeit Bicycle Accessory Sellers Over Trademark

SUPACAZ has initiated a trademark enforcement lawsuit in the United States, covering bicycle accessories and apparel. The case has been filed but assets are not yet frozen. Cross-border sellers are advised to conduct self-checks of their store products to avoid infringement risks. Pay close attention to Class 12 and Class 25 trademarks, examine graphic and word trademarks, and product appearances. Promptly remove any potentially infringing products from your listings.

GBC Assumes Bounce Curl Lawsuit Escalating Trademark Disputes for Sellers

GBC Assumes Bounce Curl Lawsuit Escalating Trademark Disputes for Sellers

Bounce Curl's EdgeLift comb faces another lawsuit, now handled by GBC Law Firm. This article analyzes the case background, key infringement risks, and provides sellers with actionable advice. Recommendations include checking and removing potentially infringing products, seeking professional legal assistance, and potentially forming groups to address the litigation collectively. The goal is to help sellers minimize potential losses and protect their rights in the face of this new legal challenge.

Amazon Sellers Face Lawsuit Over Opulent Treasures Cake Stand

Amazon Sellers Face Lawsuit Over Opulent Treasures Cake Stand

A trademark and copyright enforcement lawsuit concerning OPULENT TREASURES cake stands is underway in Illinois, USA. Opulent Treasures Inc., a well-known home decor manufacturer, has registered word and design trademarks covering categories such as lighting, furniture, and kitchenware. Sellers should self-inspect their products to avoid infringement risks and strengthen their intellectual property protection awareness. This case highlights the importance of respecting and protecting registered trademarks and copyrights in the home decor industry.